<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Diggings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings</link>
	<description>A blog about recruitment advertising, media, publishing, HR, work, &#38; technology, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><cloud domain='blogs.jobdig.com' port='80' path='/diggings/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s &#8216;Parisian Love&#8217; Search On Ad Takes Top Prize In Superbowl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/02/08/googles-parisian-love-ad-takes-top-prize-in-superbowl/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/02/08/googles-parisian-love-ad-takes-top-prize-in-superbowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Superbowl Ads in 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Superbowl Ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parisian Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course a search engine is going to take the top prize in the annual advertising competition known as the Superbowl. How could they not given the drivel put forward by Doritos, GoDaddy, Skechers, and most of the other advertisers?
The ads were generally disappointing this year (Monster and Careerbuilder&#8217;s spots were particularly weak), with only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fgoogles-parisian-love-ad-takes-top-prize-in-superbowl%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fgoogles-parisian-love-ad-takes-top-prize-in-superbowl%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p style="text-align: justify">Of course a search engine is going to take the top prize in the annual advertising competition known as the Superbowl. How could they not given the drivel put forward by Doritos, GoDaddy, Skechers, and most of the other advertisers?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The ads were generally disappointing this year (Monster and Careerbuilder&#8217;s spots were particularly weak), with only a few exceptions. The E*Trade spots were amusing (Dad?!?!?), the Coke ad in Africa with Bolero playing was great, as was the Bud Light Lost spoof, and the Brett Favre spot was good. Flo TV&#8217;s spots weren&#8217;t too notable but their technology looks awesome and I&#8217;m sure they will be firmly planted on their target demo&#8217;s tech gadget &#8216;must have&#8217; list thanks to the $20 million or so they spent yesterday. Other than that, most of the ads were terrible.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">But without a doubt, the absolute best ad of the day was Google&#8217;s &#8216;Parisian Love&#8217; search ad. As CEO Eric Schmidt warned via Twitter, hell has frozen over and Google has finally decided to start marketing its search engine via mass media. What a debut it was. I&#8217;m sorry that we had to wait so long for such brilliant marketing.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nnsSUqgkDwU&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nnsSUqgkDwU&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/02/08/googles-parisian-love-ad-takes-top-prize-in-superbowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look For A Very Positive January 2010 Jobs Report Friday</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/02/03/look-for-a-very-positive-jobs-report-friday/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/02/03/look-for-a-very-positive-jobs-report-friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment & Jobs Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areas of Strength in the Job Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areas of Weakness In The Job Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLS January '10 Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLS Jobs Numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoL January '10 Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoL Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy Adding Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[January 2010 Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[January Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Growth State by State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Search Engine Reports Positive News For January]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobless Recovery May Be Over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Job Listings by State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Jobs Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Plan To Add Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Plan to Create Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surprising Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Best Job Search Engine on the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Recession May Be Over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Job Listings By State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy Adding Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What States Are Adding Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What States Are Losing Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Where Are There Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January&#8217;s jobs report from the Department of Labor is scheduled to be released later this week and based on data released this morning by LinkUp, Friday&#8217;s report will show that the job market improved sharply during the month. LinkUp, a job search engine that indexes jobs from over 20,000 company websites throughout the U.S., reported [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Flook-for-a-very-positive-jobs-report-friday%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Flook-for-a-very-positive-jobs-report-friday%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p style="text-align: justify">January&#8217;s jobs report from the Department of Labor is scheduled to be released later this week and based on data released this morning by LinkUp, Friday&#8217;s report will show that the job market improved sharply during the month. <a href="http://www.linkup.com/" target="_blank">LinkUp, a job search engine</a> that indexes jobs from over 20,000 company websites throughout the U.S., reported that new job listings on company websites rose by 69,082 (18%) from December. Total job  listings on company websites in LinkUp&#8217;s search engine increased by 34,525 (4%). This is in sharp contrast to <a href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/07/tomorrows-december-jobs-report-will-be-far-worse-than-expected/" target="_blank">LinkUp&#8217;s dismal December report</a> in which new and total job listings plummeted by 24% and 17% respectively.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Increases in job listings were widespread throughout the country, with 44  states (45 including Washington, D.C.) reporting more new job openings  on company websites than the previous month and only 6 states reporting declines in new job listings. Total job listings on company websites rose in 43 states (44 including  Washington, D.C.), with only 7 states reporting decreases in January.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkup.com/trends/job-growth-by-state/january-2010.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1433" title="LinkUp January Job Listings by State" src="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/files/2010/02/January-LinkUp-Jobs-by-State.jpg" alt="" width="469" height="708" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">LinkUp, the fastest growing job search engine on the web, indexes job  listings from over 20,000 corporate and employer websites throughout the country. Because the index is updated daily and only includes job listings  that are found on career portals within company websites, the completely  unique jobs data is extremely reliable. There are no jobs from  recruiters, headhunters, search firms, or staffing companies, and no scam  jobs, phishing jobs, <a href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/28/beware-of-money-mule-job-listings-on-monster-careerbuilder-indeed-and-simplyhired/" target="_blank">&#8216;money mule&#8217; ads</a>, or other fraudulent postings.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">And because LinkUp  only indexes jobs from a single source – the hiring company itself –  there are no duplicate listings that pollute job board aggregator sites  such as Indeed and Simplyhired. Perhaps most importantly given the current high-unemployment environment in which companies are not compelled to advertise as aggressively in order to generate candidate flow for their openings, the jobs data is not based upon paid help-wanted advertising activity.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkup.com/trends/best-and-worst-by-state/january-2010.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1434" title="Jan.'10 LinkUp Jobs best &amp; worst state" src="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/files/2010/02/Jan.10-LinkUp-Jobs-best-worst-state.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="378" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">In terms of the best and worst performing states, Texas, Florida, and Virginia showed the largest increases in new job listings, while California, Massachusetts, and Tennessee  reported the largest declines in new job listings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/02/03/look-for-a-very-positive-jobs-report-friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of Money Mule Job Listings On Monster, Careerbuilder, Indeed, And Simplyhired</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/28/beware-of-money-mule-job-listings-on-monster-careerbuilder-indeed-and-simplyhired/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/28/beware-of-money-mule-job-listings-on-monster-careerbuilder-indeed-and-simplyhired/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advice For Job Seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avoid Job Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Krens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CareerBuilder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexing Jobs From Company Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Search Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Search Engines Reduce Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Mule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay To Post Job Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay To Post Job Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republishing Job Listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SimplyHired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Best Job Search Engine on the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work-at-home Scams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, G.L. and I were fortunate enough to have the opportunity to participate in a Careerealism webinar for job seekers organized by career advice expert J.T. O&#8217;Donnell. During the discussion about how to effectively use online resources in a job search, we mentioned the risks associated with traditional pay-to-post job sites such as Monster and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F28%2Fbeware-of-money-mule-job-listings-on-monster-careerbuilder-indeed-and-simplyhired%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F28%2Fbeware-of-money-mule-job-listings-on-monster-careerbuilder-indeed-and-simplyhired%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p style="text-align: justify">Yesterday, G.L. and I were fortunate enough to have the opportunity to participate in a <a href="http://www.careerealism.com/" target="_blank">Careerealism</a> webinar for job seekers organized by career advice expert J.T. O&#8217;Donnell. During the discussion about how to effectively use online resources in a job search, we mentioned the risks associated with traditional pay-to-post job sites such as Monster and Careerbuilder as well as job aggregators such as Indeed and Simplyhired that republish job listings from Monster, Careerbuilder, and thousands of other pay-to-post job boards.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The risks we mentioned result from the prevalence of fraudulent listings that include scam jobs, phishing posts, identity theft, and work-at-home scams. Additionally, criminals  mine resumes on job sites to recruit new victims. In the current high-unemployment environment, this kind of activity is worse than ever. Because <a href="http://www.linkup.com/" target="_blank">LinkUp&#8217;s job search engine</a> eliminates these risks due to the fact that we do not collect resumes, only index jobs from company websites, and do not allow anyone to post jobs directly onto LinkUp, this is a major point of differentiation between LinkUp and other job listing sites on the web.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Lest anyone accuse us of hyperbole, I thought I&#8217;d write a post about &#8216;Money Mules.&#8217;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Money mules are people that unwittingly use their bank accounts to help criminals launder money. Money mules are recruited through work-at home job postings on Monster and Careerbuilder with titles such as &#8216;Financial Manager&#8217; and a job description that involves &#8216;moving money for an international company.&#8217; These new recruits then provide their bank account information to their &#8216;employer&#8217; and are told to withdraw cash that has been deposited into their account at a specific time and wire it abroad via Western Union or Moneygram.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify"><a href="http://www.krebsonsecurity.com/about/" target="_blank">Brian Krebs</a>, a reporter at The Washington Post from 1994 to 2009 has written extensively on this issue and has exposed hundreds of these scams. I would strongly recommend that anyone looking for a job online as well as those offering advice for job seekers take some time to read his outstanding work highlighting this fraudulent activity. A few of his blog posts can be found <a href="http://www.krebsonsecurity.com/2010/01/top-10-ways-to-get-fired-as-a-money-mule/" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/09/money_mule_recruitment_101.html" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/09/money_mules_carry_loot_for_org.html" target="_blank">here</a>. I&#8217;ve also included portions of those posts below that relate to the scam listings on Monster and Careerbuilder:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;text-align: justify">&#8220;&#8230;Money mules are recruited through work-at-home job offers that arrive  via e-mail, usually claiming that the prospective employer found the  recipient’s resume’ on careerbuilder.com, monster.com, or some other  job search site. Recruits are told they will be helping to move money  for international companies, and are asked to provide their bank account  and routing numbers so that they can receive incoming transfers.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;text-align: justify">&#8220;&#8230;The Sanford mule &#8212; who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear  of reprisals by the hacked company and perhaps by the hackers themselves  &#8212; said the Scope Group approached her via e-mail, saying it had found  her resume on <strong>Careerbuilder.com</strong>, and would she be  interested in a work-at-home job acting as a &#8220;financial manager&#8221;? Having  worked as a payroll manager in a previous job, the mule said she  thought it was a perfect fit. Besides, she said, she&#8217;d been out of work  since March.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;text-align: justify">&#8220;&#8230;This type of crime is impossible without the cooperation of so-called  &#8220;money mules,&#8221; willing or unwitting individuals typically hired via  Internet job search Web sites to act as &#8220;local agents&#8221; or &#8220;financial  agents&#8221; responsible for moving money on behalf of a generic-sounding  international corporation, legal experts say.The mules are then  instructed to withdraw the cash and wire it via Western Union or  Moneygram to fraud gangs overseas, typically in Eastern Europe. It is not uncommon for a single cyber robbery to depend on the help  of dozens of money mules&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Fraudulent job listings on traditional pay-to-post job sites are a serious risk, and the industry has to be more vocal about educating the public about using sites such as Monster, Careerbuilder, Indeed, and Simplyhired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/28/beware-of-money-mule-job-listings-on-monster-careerbuilder-indeed-and-simplyhired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ladders Is One Gigantic Scam That Preys On Unsuspecting Job Seekers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/27/the-ladders-is-one-gigantic-scam-that-preys-on-unsuspecting-job-seekers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/27/the-ladders-is-one-gigantic-scam-that-preys-on-unsuspecting-job-seekers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shuttered Job Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Campaigns Don't Legitimize Fraudulent Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crimes In Broad Daylight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crooks In The Job Board Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraudulent Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrison Barnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrison Barnes and Hound Are Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Board Industry Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Cenedella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Never Pay For Job Listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speak Out About Crooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stand Up Against Crooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Hound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop The Ladders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ladders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ladders Is A Scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick Corcodilos, aka Ask The Headhunter, has written an outstanding article on his blog about what an absolute scam The Ladders is and how fraudulent their claims are about delivering to job seekers &#8216;only $100K+ job listings.&#8217; I have written about what a rip-off The Ladders is in the past, and I applaud anyone who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F27%2Fthe-ladders-is-one-gigantic-scam-that-preys-on-unsuspecting-job-seekers%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F27%2Fthe-ladders-is-one-gigantic-scam-that-preys-on-unsuspecting-job-seekers%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p style="text-align: justify">Nick Corcodilos, aka Ask The Headhunter, has written an <a href="http://corcodilos.com/blog/1390/theladders-job-board-salary-fraud" target="_blank">outstanding article on his blog about what an absolute scam The Ladders is</a> and how fraudulent their claims are about delivering to job seekers &#8216;only $100K+ job listings.&#8217; I have <a href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2009/04/07/stay-away-from-sites-that-charge-a-fee-for-recycled-job-listings/" target="_blank">written about what a rip-off The Ladders is in the past</a>, and I applaud anyone who helps shine a light on what a disservice Marc Cenedella and the other hacks who work for The Ladders are doing to job seekers, employers, and the entire recruitment advertising &amp; talent acquisition industry. I especially applaud Nick for writing such a thoughtful and well-researched piece that featured actual stories from actual victims of The Ladders scam. As I mentioned in my comment that I posted on Nick&#8217;s blog (copied below), this article is not a must read for everyone in and around the industry, but one that all of us within the jobs, career, and recruiting industries shouldpublicize as widely, aggressively, and frequently as possible.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Thanks Nick.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">My comment posted on Nick&#8217;s article:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;text-align: justify">By <a rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.linkup.com/">Toby Dayton</a><br />
January 26, 2010 at 8:27 pm</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;text-align: justify">Nick,</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;text-align: justify">This is an excellent article and one that everyone in and around the industry should publicize as widely, aggressively, and frequently as possible. The recruiting and recruitment advertising industries should do a far better job than they do of not only establishing guidelines and policies for ethical standards and best practices, but also policing themselves and calling out those who blatantly violate those standards.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;text-align: justify">Even absent those industry standards, there is absolutely no doubt that the Ladders is one of, if not THE most horrendous, fraudulent company in the industry. Thinly disguised as a job site, they are one gigantic scam. Worse than Madoff or Tom Petters (a $3 billion Minnesota Ponzi scheme), the Ladders scam is enabled by an enormous, national marketing campaign broadcasted daily on major cable channels.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;text-align: justify">It is the worst of the worst, and The Ladders should be shut down and its CEO Marc Cenedella fined and maybe even thrown in jail. In the meantime, the company should be collectively tarred and feathered, so to speak, by everyone in the industry until the noise is loud enough to be picked up by national media. This company has no business operating in our industry, and they have to be stopped.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;text-align: justify">Toby Dayton<br />
President &amp; CEO<br />
LinkUp &amp; JobDig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/27/the-ladders-is-one-gigantic-scam-that-preys-on-unsuspecting-job-seekers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m With Coco</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/14/im-with-coco/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/14/im-with-coco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I'm With Coco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late-night TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leno Isn't Very Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why Traditional Media Is Dying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone at NBC has completely lost their minds. The ridiculous episode with Conan O&#8217;Brien (by far the funniest and most entertaining person to ever appear on late-night TV) is exhibit BB in the ongoing saga that is the largely self-inflicted demise of traditional media.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F14%2Fim-with-coco%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F14%2Fim-with-coco%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>Everyone at NBC has completely lost their minds. The ridiculous episode with Conan O&#8217;Brien (by far the funniest and most entertaining person to ever appear on late-night TV) is exhibit BB in the ongoing saga that is the largely self-inflicted demise of traditional media.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1418" title="I'm with Coco" src="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/files/2010/01/Im-with-Coco.jpg" alt="I'm with Coco" width="367" height="566" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/14/im-with-coco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>29 of 36 Industries Saw Declines in Corporate Job Listings In December</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/08/29-of-36-industries-saw-declines-in-corporate-job-listings-in-december/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/08/29-of-36-industries-saw-declines-in-corporate-job-listings-in-december/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment & Jobs Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areas of Strength in the Job Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areas of Weakness In The Job Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consulting Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December Job Losses By Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries That Are Hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intern Positions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Is Stimulus Money Working?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Is the Stimulus Money Adding Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs For New Graduates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Graduate Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurant Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain and Logistics Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Best Job Search Engine on the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What Industries Are Hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Where Are There Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Where Can I Find An Internship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we anticipated, the jobs report released this morning by the Department of Labor was far worse than the consensus estimates. According to the DOL report, U.S. employers shed 85,000 jobs in December yet most economists expected to see a net increase in jobs. As the New York Times indicated:
The United States economy lost more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F08%2F29-of-36-industries-saw-declines-in-corporate-job-listings-in-december%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F08%2F29-of-36-industries-saw-declines-in-corporate-job-listings-in-december%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p style="text-align: justify">As <a href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/07/tomorrows-december-jobs-report-will-be-far-worse-than-expected/" target="_blank">we anticipated</a>, the jobs report released this morning by the Department of Labor was far worse than the consensus estimates. According to the DOL report, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/business/economy/09jobs.html?hp" target="_blank">U.S. employers shed 85,000 jobs in December</a> yet most economists expected to see a net increase in jobs. As the New York Times indicated:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;text-align: justify">The United States economy lost more jobs than expected in December, tempering hopes for a swift and sustained recovery from the Great Recession. The government reported on Friday that the economy lost another 85,000 jobs last month, but that the unemployment rate held steady at 10 percent. And in a surprise that highlighted the erratic nature of economic renewal, the Labor Department reported that 4,000 jobs were actually created in November — rather than a loss of 11,000 the government originally projected — the first gain in nearly two years. Another 16,000 job losses were added to October’s tally.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">There are two interesting aspects to the data that was released. The first is that an additional 660,000 people stopped looking for work in December, most likely due to the combination of growing discouragement and the holiday season. This is precisely why the unemployment rate stayed at 10%. As <a href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2008/05/13/us-unemployment-is-somewhere-between-9-12/" target="_blank">absurd as it may seem</a>, those people who are classified as not actively looking for work are not counted in the unemployment figures.  So as bad as the numbers are,</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The second interesting aspect of the DOL report was that November&#8217;s jobs figures were revised and showed that 4,000 jobs were actually created in November, far better than the 11,000 job losses that were initially reported last month and the first actual monthly increase in jobs since December of 2007. While this is certainly something to celebrate, it also more closely matches the <a href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2009/12/04/linkup-reports-significant-improvement-on-the-jobs-front-in-november/" target="_blank">LinkUp data from November</a> in which we reported that new job listings from company websites rose by 39,496 (9%) and total job listings on company websites rose by 33,208 (4%).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">In a continuation of yesterday&#8217;s jobs report from LinkUp, we also are releasing December jobs data by industry. Not surprisingly, the data by industry is just as grim as it is by state. New job listings on company sites dropped by 37,658 (-10%) and total jobs by industry dropped by 36,452 (-5%). (as an aside, not all jobs indexed in LinkUp&#8217;s search engine are categorized by industry, so the numbers do not square up with the state by state data). Just as alarming as the overall declines, 25 of 36 industries showed declines in new job listings, and 29 of 36 showed declines in total job listings.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkup.com/trends/job-growth-by-industry/december-2009.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1411" title="December Jobs Report by Industry" src="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/files/2010/01/December-Jobs-Report-by-Industry.jpg" alt="December Jobs Report by Industry" width="483" height="353" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">In terms of specific industries, Engineering &amp; Architecture, Sales, and Consulting added the most job listings in December, while Health &amp; Medical, Restaurant &amp; Food Service, and Supply Chain &amp; logistics lost the most job listings.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkup.com/trends/best-and-worst-by-industry/december-2009.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1412" title="December Jobs Report - Best &amp; Worst Industries" src="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/files/2010/01/December-Jobs-Report-Best-Worst-Industries.jpg" alt="December Jobs Report - Best &amp; Worst Industries" width="465" height="289" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/08/29-of-36-industries-saw-declines-in-corporate-job-listings-in-december/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>December Jobs Report Will Be Far Worse Than Expected</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/07/tomorrows-december-jobs-report-will-be-far-worse-than-expected/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/07/tomorrows-december-jobs-report-will-be-far-worse-than-expected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment & Jobs Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areas of Strength in the Job Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areas of Weakness In The Job Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December ADP Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December Consumer Confidence Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Growth State by State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Job Listings by State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Jobs Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Plan To Add Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Plan to Create Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surprising Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Best Job Search Engine on the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Recession May Be Over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Job Listings By State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Shoots Back Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unexpected Labor Data Roils Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Reacts Harshly To Unexpectedly Weak Jobs Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What States Are Adding Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What States Are Losing Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Where Are There Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Labor will release its jobs report for December tomorrow, and the data will undoubtedly show that the economy is a long way from healthy recovery mode. Economists are expecting that the U.S. economy actually added jobs during the month, marking the first monthly job gains since December of 2007. The Conference Board&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F07%2Ftomorrows-december-jobs-report-will-be-far-worse-than-expected%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F07%2Ftomorrows-december-jobs-report-will-be-far-worse-than-expected%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>The Department of Labor will release its jobs report for December tomorrow, and the data will undoubtedly show that the economy is a long way from healthy recovery mode. <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/181363-previewing-friday-s-december-2009-jobs-report" target="_blank">Economists are expecting that the U.S. economy actually added jobs</a> during the month, marking the first monthly job gains since December of 2007. The Conference Board&#8217;s Consumer Confidence Index, <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/economics/consumerConfidence.cfm" target="_blank">which rose again in December</a>, adds a faint glimmer of hope that this might be the case.</p>
<p>Not a chance.</p>
<p>If LinkUp&#8217;s data is any indication, the U.S. economy is still on life support and job growth remains a mirage. LinkUp, a job search engine that only indexes job listings that are found exclusively from over 20,000 corporate websites around the U.S., released its December jobs report today and the news is grim. Job listings on company websites in the LinkUp index dropped by 108,837 (24%) from November. Total job listings on company websites dropped by 142,641 (17%).</p>
<p>Job listing declines were widespread throughout the country, with 44 states (45 including Washington, D.C.) reporting fewer new job openings on company websites than the previous month and only 5 states reporting an increase. Total job listings dropped in 40 states (41 including Washington, D.C.), with only 8 states reporting an increase in December.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkup.com/trends/job-growth-by-state/december-2009.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1405" title="December Job Growth by State" src="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/files/2010/01/December-Job-Growth-by-State.jpg" alt="December Job Growth by State" width="464" height="717" /></a></p>
<p>LinkUp, the fastest growing job search engine on the web, indexes job listings from over 20,000 corporate and employer websites throughout the U.S. Because the index is updated daily and only includes job listings that are found on career portals within company websites, the completely unique jobs data is extremely reliable. There are no jobs from recruiters, headhunters, search firms or staffing companies, and no scam jobs, phishing jobs, or other fraudulent postings. And because LInkUp only indexes jobs from a single source – the hiring company itself – there are no duplicate listings that pollute job board aggregator sites such as Indeed and Simplyhired.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkup.com/trends/best-and-worst-by-state/december-2009.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1406" title="December Jobs Report - Best &amp; Worst States" src="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/files/2010/01/December-Jobs-Report-Best-Worst-States.jpg" alt="December Jobs Report - Best &amp; Worst States" width="464" height="378" /></a></p>
<p>In terms of the best and worst performing states, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Vermont showed the largest increases in new job listings (though the gains were still anemic), while California, Texas, and New York reported the largest declines in new job listings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/07/tomorrows-december-jobs-report-will-be-far-worse-than-expected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google On The Road To Looking Like Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/06/google-on-the-road-to-looking-like-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/06/google-on-the-road-to-looking-like-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Homepage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google versus Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google versus Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Corporate Battles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy's versus Gimbles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacrosanctity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target versus Walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First the Chrome ads popped onto Google&#8217;s homepage, and then, as expected, the Nexus One ad appeared shortly thereafter.
So much for the clean homepage that was such a part of Google&#8217;s identity.
My initial assumption is that the new clutter on the Google homepage shows just how formidable an opponent the search giant perceives Apple to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F06%2Fgoogle-on-the-road-to-looking-like-yahoo%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F06%2Fgoogle-on-the-road-to-looking-like-yahoo%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>First the Chrome ads popped onto Google&#8217;s homepage, and then, <a href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/04/google-places-ad-on-homepage/" target="_blank">as expected</a>, the Nexus One ad appeared shortly thereafter.</p>
<p>So much for the clean homepage that was such a part of Google&#8217;s identity.</p>
<p>My initial assumption is that the new clutter on the Google homepage shows just how formidable an opponent the search giant perceives Apple to be. With Chrome v. Safari and iPhone v. Nexus One, Google is willing to retreat from the sacrosanctity of its homepage in an effort to win market share. Never once in the dozens of battles with Microsoft, did Google ever feel compelled to jeopardize its homepage. Based on that fact alone, I&#8217;d chalk up round one for Apple in what is surely to become the largest corporate behemoth battle of the decade.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1401" title="Nexus One on Google Homepage" src="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/files/2010/01/Nexus-One-on-Google-Homepage.jpg" alt="Nexus One on Google Homepage" width="478" height="212" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/06/google-on-the-road-to-looking-like-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Places Ad on Homepage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/04/google-places-ad-on-homepage/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/04/google-places-ad-on-homepage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hadn&#8217;t been to the Google homepage in a while and was surprised to see an ad there&#8230;..Maybe the Nexus One ad will pop up later this week.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F04%2Fgoogle-places-ad-on-homepage%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2010%2F01%2F04%2Fgoogle-places-ad-on-homepage%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>I hadn&#8217;t been to the Google homepage in a while and was surprised to see an ad there&#8230;..Maybe the Nexus One ad will pop up later this week.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1396" title="Google Chrome on homepage" src="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/files/2010/01/Google-Chrome-on-homepage.jpg" alt="Google Chrome on homepage" width="462" height="183" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2010/01/04/google-places-ad-on-homepage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>18 Minutes? WTF?!?!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2009/12/28/18-minutes-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2009/12/28/18-minutes-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment & Jobs Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper's Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How Long Do Unemployed People Spend Each Day looking For A Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Conduct a Job Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Reduce Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Search For a Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas To Create Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas to Reduce Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Seeker Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shocking Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Administration of Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Harper&#8217;s Index in the current issue:
Average number of minutes unemployed Americans are spending looking for a job each day: 18
While extending unemployment benefits is no doubt justified for millions of Americans, this shocking statistic (if true) raises serious questions about the manner in which states are administering those benefits and the oftentimes lax [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2009%2F12%2F28%2F18-minutes-wtf%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.jobdig.com%2Fdiggings%2F2009%2F12%2F28%2F18-minutes-wtf%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>From the Harper&#8217;s Index in the current issue:</p>
<p>Average number of minutes unemployed Americans are spending looking for a job each day: 18</p>
<p>While extending unemployment benefits is no doubt justified for millions of Americans, this shocking statistic (if true) raises serious questions about the manner in which states are administering those benefits and the oftentimes lax requirements they impose (or don&#8217;t) to receive them.</p>
<p>By the way, the source for the statistic is the Department of Labor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2009/12/28/18-minutes-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
