<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspaper Sites Suffer From Horrendous Search Functionality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2009/05/12/newspaper-sites-suffer-from-horrendous-search-functionality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2009/05/12/newspaper-sites-suffer-from-horrendous-search-functionality/</link>
	<description>A blog about recruitment advertising, media, publishing, HR, work, &#38; technology, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:42:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: StevenRothberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2009/05/12/newspaper-sites-suffer-from-horrendous-search-functionality/comment-page-1/#comment-31198</link>
		<dc:creator>StevenRothberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/?p=1121#comment-31198</guid>
		<description>That the search engines built and maintained by the newspapers aren&#039;t as good as the search engine build and maintained by Google isn&#039;t much of a surprise. What is a surprise to me is that the newspapers either don&#039;t recognize the problem or don&#039;t care enough about it to do anything about it. One easy and fairly inexpensive solution is for them to throw in the towel on their homegrown technology and instead use a version of Google&#039;s search engine that would only include in its search results pages from the newspaper. We do that with our articles, blogs, and other such content. It works great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the search engines built and maintained by the newspapers aren&#39;t as good as the search engine build and maintained by Google isn&#39;t much of a surprise. What is a surprise to me is that the newspapers either don&#39;t recognize the problem or don&#39;t care enough about it to do anything about it. One easy and fairly inexpensive solution is for them to throw in the towel on their homegrown technology and instead use a version of Google&#39;s search engine that would only include in its search results pages from the newspaper. We do that with our articles, blogs, and other such content. It works great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
