<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tip #1 For Effective SEO for Corporate Career Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2007/10/22/tip-1-for-effective-seo-for-corporate-career-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2007/10/22/tip-1-for-effective-seo-for-corporate-career-sites/</link>
	<description>A blog about recruitment advertising, media, publishing, HR, work, &#38; technology, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:42:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Toby Dayton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2007/10/22/tip-1-for-effective-seo-for-corporate-career-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-17874</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby Dayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2007/10/22/tip-1-for-effective-seo-for-corporate-career-sites/#comment-17874</guid>
		<description>Recruiting Animal - This is the response I got from our web guy (far more qualified than I am in responding to your question).

&quot;Overall page graphics are fine, as long as they&#039;re using &quot;alt&quot; tags (http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol6/html_no1.htm). It&#039;s for the individual page titles that using graphics is a bad idea. Like on http://www.recruitingbloggers.com/ - using a graphic that said &quot;Women Are The Leaders Now&quot; would be a horrible idea. The way you have it right now is the wisest choice.

I hope that helps.

Toby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recruiting Animal &#8211; This is the response I got from our web guy (far more qualified than I am in responding to your question).</p>
<p>&#8220;Overall page graphics are fine, as long as they&#8217;re using &#8220;alt&#8221; tags (<a href="http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol6/html_no1.htm)" rel="nofollow">http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol6/html_no1.htm)</a>. It&#8217;s for the individual page titles that using graphics is a bad idea. Like on <a href="http://www.recruitingbloggers.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.recruitingbloggers.com/</a> &#8211; using a graphic that said &#8220;Women Are The Leaders Now&#8221; would be a horrible idea. The way you have it right now is the wisest choice.</p>
<p>I hope that helps.</p>
<p>Toby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recruiting Animal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2007/10/22/tip-1-for-effective-seo-for-corporate-career-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-17873</link>
		<dc:creator>Recruiting Animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jobdig.com/diggings/2007/10/22/tip-1-for-effective-seo-for-corporate-career-sites/#comment-17873</guid>
		<description>What about the header. I switched from a standard text header on Typepad to a fancier jpg header with fancier graphics. Is that a big mistake?

You can see the graphic header here: http://recruitingshow.com and the standard text header here http://www.recruitingbloggers.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the header. I switched from a standard text header on Typepad to a fancier jpg header with fancier graphics. Is that a big mistake?</p>
<p>You can see the graphic header here: <a href="http://recruitingshow.com" rel="nofollow">http://recruitingshow.com</a> and the standard text header here <a href="http://www.recruitingbloggers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.recruitingbloggers.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
